centre left right right

1891 Census List including Paxton House, West Drayton

As of September 2021 a list of 1891 census records for West Drayton was available on the internet and the section around Station Road was downloaded. (Pages printed erratically and they have been adjusted to produce a continuous document of six pages. Handwritten annotations made during examination have mostly been removed but some remain.)

The 1891 census records downloaded from the internet comprise a list of properties and for each property a list of residents. Each complete record (address and occupants) is assigned a schedule number. Where an address is present with no occupants and no schedule number it has been treated here as unoccupied although clearly there could be a number of reasons for such entries (non-compliance, for example).

For the section of Station Road in which Paxton House is listed, schedule numbers 179 to 188, there is 100% coincidence between the census records (1891) and the map (1894) and it can be seen that the part of Station Road that was known as 'De Burgh Crescent' consisted of the nine properties South of the narrow strip of land adjacent to the property shown as 'Paxton House' (divided into two dwellings on the map) directly opposite the school. That property is described in the census records as 'Paxton House' and is the property now identified as 147 and 149 Station Road.

A complete list of the properties shown in the part of the census list downloaded follows (schedule number and address; text colours the same as the map above):


The census list is shown here on six pages. The occupants of Paxton House, schedule 179, are shown as the Thompson family. They were probably tenants because they are not shown as owners on a document from Hilligdon Archives headed 'Deeds for Paxton House, West Drayton'.

At the time of writing, November 2021, this list can be accessed by a google search:

de burgh cresce orchard villas

and choosing 'Middlesex 1891 Uxbridge - RootsWeb' from the search results. (note: 'cresce' not 'crescent')